摘要

最高人民法院关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定中首次规定了释明制度，然而对于释明制度的具体构建，在立法上仍待系统化与明确化。本文通过对释明制度在现行立法与实践中的体现进行研究，总结释明制度现状中存在的问题，并结合释明制度的立法目的与理念，对如何完善释明制度，规范法官释明权的行使，从诉讼请求、事实主张等角度提出了具体的建议以及原则上的指引。研究释明的具体化，不仅有助于实现民事诉讼的目的，而且有助于推进我国司法改革的进程。

关键词：释明权；具体化；民事诉讼；法官中立

Abstract

The Supreme People's Court stipulated the interpretation system for the first time in some regulations on civil litigation evidence. However, the concrete construction of the interpretation system needs to be systematized and clarified in legislation. By studying the embodiment of the interpretation system in the current legislation and practice, this paper summarizes the problems existing in the present situation of the interpretation system,and puts forward specific suggestions on how to improve the interpretation system and standardize the exercise of the judge's interpretation right from the perspectives of litigation request and factual claim. Studying the concretization of interpretation will not only help to achieve the purpose ofcivil litigation, but also help to promote the process of judicial reform in China.

Key words: the right of interpretation; Embodied; Civil litigation; Judge neutrality

目录

内容摘要 1

Abstract II

引言 4

（一）选题背景和意义 4

（二）研究现状 4

一 释明制度的现状分析 7

（一）释明制度的立法考察 7

（二）释明制度的实践考察 8

一、 释明制度的理论分析 8

（一）释明制度的功能分析 9

(二) 释明制度的理论争议 11

二、 释明制度的具体建构 12

（一）释明的对象 12

（二）释明的基本原则 16

（三）释明的激励与约束 17

四、结语 18