| 以下仅列出文章摘要、提纲简介，如需获取全文阅读权限，或原创定制、长期合作，请随时联系。 微信QQ:312050216 |
 |
 |
| 文书提出命令在知识产权案件中的适用 【摘要】 在民事诉讼中“举证难”的问题一直未能有效解决，成为阻碍法院查清案件事实真相，化解当事人纠纷的关键障碍之一，新型民事诉讼带来的“证据偏在”问题又进一步加重举证困难。2009年最高人民法院修改《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》，再次体现了文书提出命令作为当事人取得证据的重要渠道之一的可能性。于此，本文对文书提出命令进行探究，主要关注该制度在知识产权领域的适用情况。比较域内外的立法状况，由制度规则到实践运用，旨在基于当前我国文书提出命令的框架，考量得以适用的细化规则，并提出完善建议。 【关键词】 文书提出命令 证据偏在 知识产权 民事诉讼 The Application of Orders for Production of Documents in Intellectual Property Cases 【Abstract】 The problem of "difficulty of proof" in civil litigation has not been effectively resolved, and it has become one of the key obstacles that hinder the courts from finding out the truth of the case and resolving disputes between the parties. The problem of "majority of evidence owned by one party" brought about bynew types of civil procedure has further increased the difficulty of proof. In 2009, the Supreme People's Court revised "the Some Provisions on Evidencein Civil Procedures", which once again demonstrated the possibility of document submission as one of the important channels for parties to obtain evidence. Thus, this article explores the order of the document,focusing on the application of the system in the field of intellectual property rights. Comparing the legislative situation inside and outside the territory,from system regulations to practical application,aims at considering the applicable detailed rules based on the framework of current Chinese documents to propose orders, and putting forward suggestions for improvement. 【Key Words】 Orders for Production of Documents Evidence Ownedby One Party Intellectual Property Civil Procedure |
