摘要：本文站在综合未遂论的立场上，认为未遂犯与不能犯判别的实质在于行为是否具有规范意义上侵害法益的危险。作为行为危险有无的判别，应以一般人所认识到的情况以及行为人特殊认识的情况为判断材料，站在行为时的角度，根据一般科学社会经验知识，具体的判断行为是否具有危险，如果得出肯定结论，是未遂犯；如果结合上述方法仍难以确定行为危险存在的，则为不能犯。理论及实践上采取具体危险说，既有助于改变我国传统刑法理论不当扩大未遂犯的做法，也避免了在采取客观危险说时不能犯过于广泛的弊端。其是符合我国社会实际的判别标准，能够有效发挥刑法的一般预防功能，取得打击犯罪与保障人权之间的平衡。

关键词：未遂犯 不能犯 综合未遂论 具体危险说 作为行为的危险

On the difference between an attempted offense and an incapable offense

Abstract： Based on the comprehensive attempt theory,this article believes that the essence of judging an attempted offense and an incapable offense lies in whether the behavior is in danger of infringing legal interests. The judgment of whether the behavior is dangerous should be based on the situation recognized by ordinary people and the situation that the perpetrator particularly knows. From the standpoint of the behavior,judge whether the behavior is dangerous according to general scientific social experience and knowledge. If a positive conclusion is reached, It is an attempted crime;if it is still difficult to determine the existence of the danger based on the above requirements, it is an incapable crime. Adopting specific danger theory in theory and practice not only helps to change the practice of improperly expanding attempted offenses in traditional criminal law theory in our country,but also avoids the disadvantage of not being too extensive when adopting objective danger theory. It is in line with the actual judgment standards of our society,can effectively play the general preventive function of criminallaw, and strike a balance between fighting crime and protecting human rights.

Key words: Attempted offenses；Incapable offenses；the comprehensive attempt theory；Specific danger theory；Danger as behavior