深石原则在我国的适用研究 摘要:随着经济市场的快速发展,司法体制改革的不断完善,起源于美国的“深石原则”(又称“衡平居次原则”)致力于保护债权人利益的制度闯进了人们的视野中。控股公司与从子公司存在着的密切关系,为相互间利益的输送提供了便利条件,隐蔽的交易手段如果不加以有效监督,会使得控股公司在巨额利益面前冲破法律底线,变相借助子公司为工具,导致子公司破产,从而获得的不当债权会影响到从属公司其他债权人的债权无法公平清偿。在我国现有的法律制度框架下,破产程序中没有对不公平行为引起的债权与普通债权先后清偿的法律规则,而在司法实践中控制公司利用多种手段侵害着他人的合法利益,破产公司剩余财产的不公平分配问题日益突出,破产公司债权人为了维护自身的债权能够实现,不断地寻求法律救济,也引起了学者、立法者和司法者高度的高度重视。2013 年最高人民法院公布的典型案例再一次将入“深石原则”在我国的适用的话题又一次点燃,本文遵循提出问题、分析问题和解决问题的思路,对“深石原则”在我国的适用进行研究。 关键词:深石原则,不公平行为,普通债权,控股公司,子公司 Study on the Application of Deep Stone Principle in China Abstract: with the rapid development of economic market and the continuous improvement of judicialsystem reform, the system of "deep stone principle (also known as" equitable secondary principle"), which originates from the United States, is committed to protecting the interests of creditors. The close relationship between the holding company and the subsidiary company provides convenient conditions for the transmission of mutual interests. If the hidden trading means are not effectively supervised,the holding company will break through the bottom line of the law in the face of huge interests. In the Under the framework of our existing legal system,there are no legal rules in bankruptcy proceedings to pay off the creditor's rights caused by unfair behavior andordinary creditor's rights successively,but in judicial practice, controlling the company to use various means to infringe upon the legitimate interests of others, the unfair distribution of the remaining property of the bankrupt company is becoming more and more prominent. The typical case published by the Supreme People's Court in 2013 will once againignite the topic of the application of the "deep stone principle" in our country. This article follows the questions raised Problems,analysis of problems and solutions to the problem, the application of the "deep stone principle" in China. Keywords: Deep Stone Principle,Unfair Behavio, Creditor Rights, Holding Company,Subsidiary |
深石原则在我国的适用研究
更新时间:2023-05-30
上一篇:中国宪法上紧急状态的规范分析
下一篇:论对赌协议的法律性质