| 以下仅列出文章摘要、目录等部分内容，如需获取完整论文资料，或原创定制、长期合作，请随时联系。 微信QQ:312050216 |
 |
 |
| 行政性垄断的负面效应及其规制 摘要 在推进依法行政的过程之中，我国涉及行政性垄断的案件仍屡见不鲜，我们应当对该类现象进行反思。基于行政性垄断的特点和成因，相关的负面案例亦证实了其带来的如市场效率降低和消费者利益减损等消极效应；由此可见，设立应对行政性垄断的规制措施迫在眉睫；因此，应在注重立法前瞻的基础上，逐步构建完善的行政性垄断规制体系。 关键词：行政性垄断；法律规制；依法行政 On Negative Effects of Administrative Monopoly and Its Regulations ABSTRACT While implementing the principle of Administration According to Law,a multitude of cases involving administrative monopoly can easily be discovered in China, which reminds us of the need for a rethink among this issue. Based on the characteristics and historical causes of administrative monopoly,relevant cases have also confirmed its passive effects such as the decline ofmarket efficiency and the loss of consumer interests,delivering the notion that a sound regulation system against administrative monopoly should be progressively established based on the close attention to the legislative foresight. Keywords: Administrative Monopoly, Legal Regulation, Administration to Law 目录 1.行政性垄断的介绍 1 1.1 行政性垄断的定义 1 1.2 行政性垄断的历史成因 1 1.3 行政性垄断的分类 1 2.行政性垄断的消极案例 2 2.1 榆林市环境保护局行业垄断案 2 2.2 四川、浙江两省卫计委区域垄断案 2 2.3 牡丹江市城乡建设局、绥芬河市人民政府公用事业垄断案 3 3.行政性垄断的负面效应 3 3.1 市场效率降低 3 3.2 消费者利益减损 3 4.行政性垄断的规制 4 4.1 完善并规范行政性垄断的立法 4 4.2 稳步推进公平竞争审查制度 4 4.3 加强对行政性垄断的监督 5 结语 6 参考文献 7 |
