当前位置:主页 > 英语外语论文 >

环境伦理学视角下《野性的呼唤》和《狼图腾》之比较

更新时间:2018-07-06
阅享价格80元 资料包括:原始论文 点击这里给我发消息QQ在线咨询
文档格式:doc/docx 全文字数:7200 温馨提示
以下仅列出文章摘要、提纲简介,如需获取全文阅读权限,或原创定制、长期合作,请随时联系。
微信QQ:312050216 点击这里给我发消息
扫一扫 扫一扫
环境伦理学视角下《野性的呼唤》和《狼图腾》之比较【英语论文】

[摘要] 本文从环境伦理学视域对比分析《野性的呼唤》和《狼图腾》两部作品,探讨人类中心主义批判和“荒野回归”两个方面。“荒野回归”即动物解放与动物权利、生物中心主义、生态中心主义三个方面。文章通过对比人物形象和人类所造成后果,分析两部作品对人类中心主义的批判。通过对比两部作品中动物和人类不同的回归方式,分析他们在动物解放与动物权利、生物中心主义和、生态中心主义三个层面的回归。从环境伦理学视角解读两部作品,不但批判了过度膨胀的人类中心主义思想,而且对日趋严重生态问题、日益疏离的人与自然的关系提出警告。同时为读者提供一个全新的解读视角,促使人们反思人与动物、自然和谐共生的关键,即人类怀着爱心让野性回归荒野、人性回归自然的启示。
[关键词]环境伦理学  人类中心主义  荒野回归  回归方式
A Comparative Study of The Call of The                      Wild and Wolf Totem from the Perspective of Environmental Ethics
[Abstract] This paper analyzes The Call of the Wild and Wolf Totem from the perspective of environmental ethics, and embodies two spheres: anthropocentrism criticism and wilderness regression. Now, the regression is comprised three aspects: animal liberation and animal rights, biological centrism, and ecological centralism. The article analyzes the criticism of the anthropocentrism of the two works by comparing the characters and the consequences that caused by human beings. By comparing the different regressions of animals and humans in the two works, this paper analyzes their regression on the level of animal liberation and animal rights, the level of biological centralism and the level of ecological centralism. Unscramble these two works from the perspective of environmental ethics not only criticizes the over-inflated anthropocentrism, but also admonishes of severe ecological dilemma increasingly and the alienated relationship between man and nature. At the same time, it provides readers with a new scrutable perspective, which makes people think about the key to the harmonious coexistence of human beings and animals and nature.
[Keywords]  Environmental Ethics Anthropocentrism Wilderness regression Regression way