当前位置:主页 > 法律法学论文 >

恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪—“以非法占有为目的”的认定分析

更新时间:2023-03-22
所需金币80 [1金币=1元] 资料包括:原始论文 点击这里给我发消息 QQ在线咨询
文档格式:doc/docx 全文字数:10000 ↓↓立即下载全文 **温馨提示**
以下仅列出文章摘要、目录等部分内容,如需获取完整论文资料,或原创定制、长期合作,请随时联系。
微信QQ:312050216
点击这里给我发消息
扫一扫 扫一扫
恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪—“以非法占有为目的”的认定分析


摘要
 
根据司法大数据分析结果显示,我国信用卡诈骗罪案件中,恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪一直是主要的犯罪形态,尽管2018年司法解释修改生效后恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪案件总数有所下降,但其占信用卡诈骗罪的比重仍然较大。要如何理解恶意透支型信用卡诈骗罪中“以非法占有为目的”,避免或减少刑事法律规范对民事纠纷的过度干预,这都需要我们要从不同角度合理分析 “以非法占有为目的”的认定标准,准确解读相关法律法规关于恶意透支中“以非法占有为目的”的相关规定,以期在司法实践中能够践行刑法“出罪”理念,让定罪量刑也更加符合刑法的谦抑性原则。
 
关键词:信用卡诈骗罪 恶意透支 以非法占有为目的 谦抑原则 认定标准
 
 
 
 
Abstract
 
According to judicial big data analysis results,malicious overdraft of credit card fraud has always been the main crime pattern in China's credit card fraud cases. Although the total number of malicious overdraft of credit card fraud cases decreased after the judicial interpretation modification took effect in 2018, it still accounted for a large proportion of credit card fraud crimes. How to understand the type of malicious overdraft of credit card fraud "for the purpose of illegal possession",avoid or reduce the excessive intervention of criminal legal norm of civil disputes,this need we to rational analysis from different angles "for the purpose of illegalpossession" standards, accurate interpretation of relevant laws and regulations aboutmalicious overdraft "for the purpose of illegal possession" of the relevant provisions, in order to the practice of criminal law in the judicial practice the concept of "sin", let the criterions for the conviction also more in line with the tolerance principle in the criminal law.
 
Keywords:credit card fraud; malicious overdraft;for the purpose of illegal possession; modesty principle; standards