摘 要

近年来，随着无刑事责任能力人实施严重危害社会行为的案件高发，《刑法修正案(十一)》关于刑事责任年龄个别下调的规定，引发了社会和学界的广泛关注。传统的刚性立法模式难以适应现实需要，维持刑法原有的关于刑事责任年龄的规定，或者绝对下调刑事责任年龄，都不是理想的抉择。而弹性的最低刑事责任年龄不仅有利于制度偏差的矫正，也有利于宽严相济刑事政策的贯彻，更有利于刑法基本任务的实现，因此弹性理念是值得提倡的。在应对当前我国未成年人犯罪低龄化问题时，可以考虑针对特定犯罪适当降低我国的刑事责任年龄，并在降低的年龄区间内适用“恶意补足年龄”规则。

关键词：无刑事责任能力人；刑事责任年龄；矫治机制；恶意补足年龄

Abstract

In recent years, with the high number of cases of serious harm to social behavior caused by persons without criminal responsibility,the provisions of the Criminal Law Amendment (11) onthe individual reduction of the age of criminal responsibility have aroused wide concern in the society and the academic circles. The traditional rigid legislative model is difficult to adapt to the needs of reality,and it is not an ideal choice to maintain the original provisions of criminal law on the age of criminal responsibility, or to reduce the age of criminal responsibility absolutely. The minimum age of criminal responsibility for flexibility is not only conduciveto the correction of institutional deviation,but also conducive to the implementation ofthe criminal policy of leniency, and more conducive to the realization of the basic tasks of criminal law, so the concept of flexibility is worth advocating. In order to deal with the problem of the low age of juvenile delinignment in our country,we can consider reducing the age of criminal responsibility appropriately for specific crimes, and apply the rule of "maliciously supplementing the age" in the lower age range.

Key words: Age of criminal responsibility; minor; malignant crime;Malicious supplement age