| 以下仅列出文章摘要、提纲简介，如需获取全文阅读权限，或原创定制、长期合作，请随时联系。 微信QQ:312050216 |
 |
 |
| 拉斯柯尼科夫与斯维里加洛夫的形象比较分析 摘 要：针对《罪与罚》的人物形象研究中仍以主人公拉斯科尔尼科夫的形象研究为主，但对于拉斯柯尼科夫与斯维里加洛夫之间作为犯罪主体的比较研究较少。本文将从二人在文本中的位置问题、犯罪动机的对比和二人结局的对比中探讨二人穷凶极恶的犯罪形象之下对于人性的回归：拉斯柯尼科夫与斯维里加洛夫表面虽然在作品中有主配之分，中但按照巴赫金的复调小说理论他们实际上处于平等交流的地位；斯维里加洛夫为得到杜尼娅而犯罪，拉斯柯尼科夫打着公义的旗号却只想证明自己的价值，二人的犯罪动机均是处于私欲；在最后结局，拉斯柯尼科夫自首被流放，斯维里加洛夫自尽，二人的内心挣扎象征着各自人性的回归，也体现了作者对于人性的呼唤。 In the study of the character image of "crime and punishment", we still focus on the image of the protagonist, but the comparative study of Raskolnikov and Svidrigaylov as the subject of crime is less. This article will discuss the return of the two criminal people to the human nature from the position of the text, the comparison of the motive of the crime and the comparison of the two people's ending. Although Raskolnikov is the protagonist and Svidrigaylov is a supporting role, but they are in the position of equal communication in accordance with Bakhtin's polyphony theory; Svidrigaylov committed to the crime of getting Dunia, and Raskolnikov only wanted to prove his value with the banner of justice. The two people's motives were all in private. In the final end,Raskolnikov is exile for making a political recantation and Svidrigaylov is self exhausted. The inner struggle of the two people symbolizes the return of their own human nature and the author's call for human nature. 关键词：《罪与罚》；拉斯柯尼科夫；斯维里加洛夫；犯罪 Crime and Punishment; Raskolnikov; Svidrigaylov;Crime |
