| 以下仅列出文章摘要、目录等部分内容，如需获取完整论文资料，或原创定制、长期合作，请随时联系。 微信QQ:312050216 |
 |
 |
| 试析涉外协议管辖中的实际联系原则
摘要：我国《民事诉讼法》在2012年的修订版中统一了国内和涉外纠纷的协议管辖，但将原涉外案件的协议管辖固定为被告住所地、合同履行地、合同签订地、原告住所地、标的物所在地这五个固定的连结点有失偏颇。法条设置的该五个连结点并不当然的与争议有实际联系，可能造成立法目的与实践结果的偏离的情况。同时，该条款未对“与争议有实际联系的地点”做出明确的规定，致使实际联系的适用原则缺乏可操作性与不确定性。对于电子商务纠纷来说，该连结点出现了不适配性。最后本文将通过归纳总结的方式找出各类涉外纠纷中法院对于“与案件有实际联系”的判定标准，为司法实践提供参考。
关键词：协议管辖；实际联系；意思自治
unifies the jurisdiction by agreement of domestic and foreign-related disputes,but it is biased to fix the five connection points as the place of the defendant's domicile, the place of contract performance, the place of contract signing,the place of the plaintiff's domicile and the place of the subject matter. However, in many practical cases,these five connections are not actually related to the dispute, resulting in the deviation between the legislative purpose and the practical results. At the same time, this article does not make a clear stipulation on "theplace that has actual connection with the dispute",resulting in the lack of operability and uncertainty in the application of actual connection. Then, it compares the judicial practice of the principle of practical connection between the civil law system and the common law system,and analyzes the value consideration of bringing the principle of practical connection into China. For e-commerce disputes, the traditional link points appear to be not suitable.Finally, summarizing the judgment standard of "having actual connection with the case" inall kinds of foreign-related disputes to provides reference for judicial practice.
Keywords：agreement jurisdiction, factual connection, autonomy
for judicial practice.
|
